NLPAPIsdata science

Build a Sentiment Classifier for Celebrity News: From Tweets to Scores

UUnknown

2026-02-18

10 min read

Hands-on tutorial to collect social reactions and build a sentiment model that converts tweets into a transparent public-opinion score.

You're under the clock: an instructor asked for a reproducible analysis of public reaction to a breaking celebrity story, or your project needs a fast, defensible way to quantify how people are reacting online. Social platforms are noisy, APIs change, and off-the-shelf tools often produce opaque results. In this tutorial you'll learn a reproducible, developer-friendly pipeline to gather social reactions to a story (we'll use the Julio Iglesias news cycle as an example), clean the data, train a sentiment classifier, and convert predictions into a transparent public-opinion score — all with automation-ready code and 2026 best practices.

Why this matters in 2026

Two trends make this skill indispensable today: (1) cross-platform shifts — the X/Twitter ecosystem and emerging alternatives like Bluesky saw rapid changes in late 2025 and early 2026 that affect data availability and the signal-to-noise ratio; (2) the rise of synthetic content (deepfakes and AI-generated posts) has forced analysts to combine sentiment models with authenticity signals. That means modern pipelines must be multi-platform, privacy-aware, and designed for ongoing retraining. See also guidance on data sovereignty and retention.

What you'll build (high level)

Automated data collection from social APIs (Twitter/X as primary example).
Data cleaning pipeline to normalize and deduplicate social posts.
Two sentiment approaches: a fast lexicon/heuristic baseline and a trainable ML classifier.
Aggregation rules to compute a public-opinion score (range -1 to +1 and 0–100).
Deployment notes: streaming vs batch, rate-limit handling, ethical guardrails.

Quick architecture diagram (conceptual)

Collector: Twitter/X API (or other platform) & rate-limit-aware fetcher
Cleaner: normalize text, remove spam, language detection
Labeler: lexicon/weak labels for bootstrapping
Trainer: TF-IDF + Logistic Regression (fast) or fine-tuned DistilBERT (accurate)
Aggregator: weighted sentiment -> public opinion score
Dashboard / Export: CSV, plots, alerts

Prerequisites

Python 3.9+ environment
API keys: Twitter/X developer bearer token (or equivalent), optional Bluesky client
Libraries: requests, tweepy, pandas, scikit-learn, nltk, transformers (optional)
Basic familiarity with Jupyter or a script-based workflow; if you're building a remote workstation consider a compact setup guide (home office tech bundles).

Step 1 — Define the story and queries

Start by defining a small set of search queries to capture relevant conversation. For the Julio Iglesias example use a combination of named-entity phrases, likely hashtags, and account handles. Aim to maximize recall first, then filter.

# Example query terms
queries = [
  '"Julio Iglesias"',
  'JulioIglesias',
  'Julio Iglesias allegations',
  'Julio Iglesias denies'
]

Tip: Include language tags if you only care about English or Spanish, e.g., add lang:en in API queries where supported. Expect to tune queries to reduce unrelated matches.

Step 2 — Collect tweets (rate-limit aware)

Below is a compact example using Tweepy with the Twitter/X v2 endpoints. This pattern handles pagination and stores JSON results for reproducibility.

from tweepy import Client
import json

client = Client(bearer_token='YOUR_BEARER_TOKEN')
query = '"Julio Iglesias" -is:retweet lang:en'

responses = []
for resp in client.search_recent_tweets(query=query, max_results=100, tweet_fields=['created_at','public_metrics','lang'], expansions=None):
    responses.extend(resp.data)

with open('julio_tweets.json', 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    json.dump([r.data for r in responses], f, ensure_ascii=False)

Notes: The actual API call will need proper pagination handling (next_token) and backoff. In 2026, many platforms impose strict quotas — consider sampling strategies and storing IDs locally so you can hydrate later if policy allows. If you plan to run frequent collections, think through edge and cost trade-offs in deployment (edge vs cloud inference & cost).

Cross-platform listening

Don't rely on a single platform. Bluesky, Mastodon, and other federated networks grew in installs during the late 2025/X controversies. If you include them, follow each platform's API docs or use generic web scraping only where allowed. For multi-platform analysis, normalize the record schema: id, text, created_at, user_followers, platform.

Step 3 — Clean and normalize text

Raw social text is messy. Cleaning reduces noise and improves model performance. Typical steps:

Remove URLs, user mentions, and excessive whitespace.
Normalize emojis and expand common contractions.
Remove duplicates and near-duplicates (same text, different retweets).
Optionally remove low-signal posts (very short, only URL, or non-target languages).

import re

def clean_text(s):
    s = re.sub(r'http\S+', '', s)
    s = re.sub(r'@\w+', '', s)
    s = re.sub(r'#', '', s)  # keep word but drop hash
    s = s.replace('\n', ' ')
    s = re.sub(r'[^\w\s\p{P}]', '', s)
    return s.strip()

Pro tip: Keep an original_text field so you can audit changes and preserve provenance for later legal or ethical review.

Step 4 — Labeling: bootstrapping and quality

Supervised learning needs labels. If you don't have a labeled dataset for the celebrity context, bootstrap with weak labels and human review.

Apply a lexicon-based tool (VADER or TextBlob) to create initial labels.
Sample tweets across predicted classes and perform human review (10–20% of data).
Use disagreement to refine heuristics and augment your training set.

from nltk.sentiment.vader import SentimentIntensityAnalyzer
sia = SentimentIntensityAnalyzer()

def vader_label(s):
    score = sia.polarity_scores(s)['compound']
    if score >= 0.05: return 'positive'
    if score <= -0.05: return 'negative'
    return 'neutral'

Why this helps: Weak labels let you train a simple model quickly. Then use active learning to prioritize human labeling for ambiguous cases. If you're building reproducible pipelines and model artifacts, consider governance and versioning best practices (versioning prompts & models).

Step 5 — Two modeling paths (fast vs accurate)

Option A: Fast classical model (TF-IDF + Logistic Regression)

This is lightweight, fast to iterate, and works well for classroom or prototype projects.

from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report

X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(texts, labels, test_size=0.2, stratify=labels)
pipe = make_pipeline(TfidfVectorizer(ngram_range=(1,2), max_features=10000), LogisticRegression(max_iter=1000))
pipe.fit(X_train, y_train)
print(classification_report(y_test, pipe.predict(X_test)))

Advantages: fast, explainable features (n-grams), easy to deploy. Use this when you have limited labeled data.

Option B: Transformer-based fine-tuning (DistilBERT)

For higher accuracy, fine-tune a pre-trained transformer. This requires more compute and care for class imbalance, but it more reliably handles nuance, sarcasm, and cultural context.

# Outline - full code requires Hugging Face Trainer setup
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification, Trainer, TrainingArguments

model_name = 'distilbert-base-uncased'
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(model_name, num_labels=3)

# tokenize, create datasets, set TrainingArguments, and Trainer

2026 tip: Use calibrated uncertainty (temperature scaling) and track data drift because conversational language changes fast around breaking stories. For implementation guides that bridge prompts, models and production, see From Prompt to Publish and governance guidance (versioning & models).

Step 6 — Evaluate and interpret

Don't rely on raw accuracy. Use class-level F1 scores, confusion matrices, and precision@k for vaccine cases. For explainability, map top contributing n-grams (for classical model) or use integrated gradients / LIME for transformer decisions.

Good evaluation balances metrics with error analysis: read the misclassified posts and see if they are ambiguous or contain sarcasm or quoted content.

Step 7 — From per-post sentiment to a public-opinion score

Predictions on individual posts are interesting; your stakeholders want a single number or a time series. Here are two robust ways to aggregate sentiment.

Simple volume-weighted mean (range -1 to +1)

Map labels to numeric values: positive=+1, neutral=0, negative=-1. Compute the mean.

score = sum(label_value[t] for t in posts) / len(posts)

Problem: equal-weighting treats a tweet from a user with 10 followers the same as an account with 100k followers.

Follower-weighted public-opinion score

Include user reach (followers) to approximate impact. Use a capped follower weight to avoid dominance by influencers.

def capped_weight(followers, cap=10000):
    return min(followers, cap) / cap

weighted_score = sum(label_value[t] * capped_weight(u.followers_count) for t, u in posts) / sum(capped_weight(u.followers_count) for _, u in posts)

Convert to a 0–100 scale with public_opinion_100 = (weighted_score + 1) * 50 for stakeholder-friendly reporting. If you need to validate reach or sample quality, operational survey practices can help — see how to run a safe paid survey on social platforms.

Step 8 — Time series and smoothing

Plot daily or hourly scores. Use rolling averages (e.g., 24-hour or 3-day) to remove volatility from short spikes.

df['score'] = df['label'].map({'positive':1,'neutral':0,'negative':-1})
daily = df.groupby(df.created_at.dt.date).apply(lambda g: weighted_mean(g))
rolling = daily.rolling(window=3, min_periods=1).mean()

Step 9 — Automation & deployment

Choose between batch and streaming:

Batch: scheduled job (cron, Cloud Run) that fetches recent posts, updates dataset, retrains periodically.
Streaming: filtered stream endpoints push matching posts; this is real-time but requires resilient reconnection and backpressure handling. Streaming architectures often benefit from edge considerations and cost trade-offs—see notes on edge-oriented cost optimization.

Set up monitoring: data freshness, model performance vs human-sampled ground truth, and drift alerts. Store raw data and artifacts in versioned storage for audits; for hybrid deployment models and production playbooks see hybrid micro-studio & edge-backed production guidance.

Step 10 — Dealing with noise, abuse, and synthetic content (2026 realities)

After the early-2026 X deepfake controversies and platform churn, it's crucial to add authenticity checks:

Flag posts from newly created accounts or with low trust signals.
Cross-check viral media with reverse-image search or provenance APIs.
Use an authenticity score as an input to downweight suspected synthetic content. The platform shifts after the X deepfake drama illustrate why authenticity must be baked into the pipeline (platform wars & authenticity).

Combining sentiment with an authenticity signal produces a more defensible public-opinion metric.

Advanced strategies and 2026 trends

Embeddings & clustering: Use sentence embeddings to group thematic conversation (accusations, defenses, legal commentary). This helps explain why the sentiment moves. Vector-based pipelines are discussed in creator and content rewrite contexts (creator commerce & rewrite pipelines).
Multi-modal signals: Combine text sentiment with image/video analysis in high-profile cases where visual content drives opinion. Multi-modal workloads influence storage and GPU planning—see notes on NVLink, RISC-V and storage architecture.
Explainable alerts: Instead of “score dropped 15 points,” show the top 10 posts and clusters that caused the drop.
Privacy-first pipelines: Implement data minimization and retention policies to comply with evolving regulations (e.g., stricter stakes in EU/US since 2024–2026). Refer to the data sovereignty checklist when designing retention and cross-border flows.

Sample end-to-end checklist (developer-friendly)

Define queries and platforms.
Get API keys and confirm rate limits.
Implement collector with pagination/backoff and store raw JSON.
Clean text and dedupe.
Bootstrap labels with VADER + human review.
Train TF-IDF + LR baseline; optionally fine-tune a transformer.
Evaluate, calibrate, and store model artifacts.
Compute weighted public-opinion score; create plots and alerts.
Automate ingestion with scheduled or streaming jobs and monitor drift.

Practical example: compute a daily Julio score

Assume you have tweets with fields: text, created_at, author_followers, predicted_label. Here's the aggregation pattern in pseudocode:

daily = tweets.group_by(date)
for day, group in daily:
    score = sum(label_val * capped_weight(followers) for each tweet) / sum(capped_weight(followers))
    public_opinion = (score + 1) * 50  # map to 0-100
    save(day, public_opinion)

Plotting this over the week of the news will show whether public sentiment is trending toward sympathy, anger, or neutrality. If you're short on time, combine these steps with a time-blocking routine to get a reproducible delivery (time-blocking & 10-minute routines).

Ethics, legal, and reproducibility

Always:

Follow platform terms of service and local laws.
Keep human review logs for contested classifications.
Document sampling and weighting choices so results are reproducible and defensible.

Trust tip: Publish methodology with any public-facing score so readers understand how the number was produced. If you need guidance on deploying models and prompt flows, review implementation guides that bridge prompts to publishable outputs (From Prompt to Publish and versioning & governance).

Actionable takeaways

Start with a TF-IDF + Logistic Regression baseline to get results fast.
Bootstrap labels using lexicons then add targeted human labeling for edge cases.
Use capped follower weighting to reflect reach without letting influencers dominate.
Prepare for synthetic content in 2026: integrate authenticity signals into scoring.
Automate ingestion but keep human-in-the-loop checks and drift monitoring.

Where to go next (Advanced resources)

Hugging Face docs — fine-tuning and calibration guides.
Scikit-learn pipelines — for production-grade inference with low latency.
Vector DBs and embeddings — for thematic clustering and semantic search; related creator & rewrite pipelines are discussed at Creator Commerce SEO.

Final notes and future predictions

By 2026, sentiment analysis pipelines will be judged not just on accuracy but on transparency and robustness to synthetic manipulation. Expect more platform fragmentation and higher demand for multi-modal, explainable systems. Teams that combine fast, interpretable baselines with targeted transformer models — and that bake in authenticity checks and ethical guardrails — will produce the most trusted public-opinion metrics. For architecture and storage implications when scaling multimodal pipelines, review how NVLink and RISC-V influence datacenter storage (NVLink & RISC-V storage architecture).

Call to action

Ready to quantify public opinion on a breaking story? Clone the starter repo (scripts for collection, cleaning, and a TF-IDF baseline), run the pipeline on a sample date range, and post your first public-opinion chart. If you want help adapting this to another platform (Bluesky, Mastodon, Instagram), or to upgrade to a transformer-based classifier with active learning, reach out or check our developer resources for starter notebooks and API snippets. For production-ready guidance on prompts, models and deployment, see From Prompt to Publish and hybrid deployment playbooks (hybrid micro-studio & edge-backed production).

Start building: collect a week's worth of posts, train the baseline, and produce a daily sentiment score—then iterate with human-labeled corrections. Your first actionable insight is often one analysis away.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.